Your agent shipped. Can you prove the work cleared a bar?
This page is a receipt: a real quality bar, a real miss, the judge’s criticism, and the iteration that cleared it.
Every number below comes from the eval record that produced it.
eng · tech specGoverned capability completion and production acceptance0.527.9s judge · 2 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: completeness (0.25), clarity (0.25), feasibility (0.25), diagrams (0.25)
“Evidence and traceability — 3/5: PR identifiers, revision hashes, and a verification contract provide traceability, but the supplied summar…”
run 576e51b5-d949-42fe-9480-4471c4b91f58“Completeness: 0.14/0.25 — the summary identifies a nine-phase plan and important safeguards, but says all phases and expert performance rem…”
run b15ab688-ecc1-49b1-82f0-d955b6433857marketing · proof distribution planSmithery connection-services deadline and dependency audit0.517.0s judge · 2 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: proof asset truthfulness (0.25), channel fit (0.20), reuse plan (0.20), cadence/owner clarity (0.15), conversion path (0.20).
“Task fit (2/5): identifies the retirement deadline and an OrgX dependency audit, but provides no actual proof-distribution plan.”
run 92613459-f850-4c09-baa6-447ee2d355d8“The artifact is careful and appropriately bounded: it states the retirement date and scope, notes that the public registry remains, and doe…”
run a50701c7-f920-47fb-a9df-c73d4dd95e1fops · operator briefHuman-approval floor local verification receipt (38/38, 170 tests)0.768.1s judge · 2 evals
design · auditEmergent concept ratification — final scoped UI evidence audit0.756.5s judge · 2 evals
Rubric
Independently evaluate the artifact on a 1–5 scale using weighted criteria: task fit (35%), evidence and traceability (25%), actionability (25%), and safety/uncertainty handling (15%). Return a weighted 0–1 score and concise evidence for each criterion. Do not use producer self-report as evidence.
“Accessibility coverage is useful but limited to keyboard/pending-decision behavior, reduced motion, zoom, and labeled fields; broader assis…”
run 60072404-a7ea-450e-800c-5d1014b7ed1e“Task fit (4/5): A focused supplementary UI audit with relevant component states, viewport conditions, and explicit separation from concept…”
run a9351e9e-f1ce-4b0d-b4d2-27fb8f812035sales · send planClient Proof Loop outreach draft — BestBytes AI candidate0.3611.2s judge · 2 evals
product · prdPRD — Northstar Reversible Local Priority Filter (SCALING-PRO-RUNTIME-20261030)0.6110.7s judge · 2 evals
Rubric
Independently evaluate the artifact on a 1–5 scale using weighted criteria: task fit (35%), evidence and traceability (25%), actionability (25%), and safety/uncertainty handling (15%). Return a weighted 0–1 score and concise evidence for each criterion. Do not use producer self-report as evidence.
“The PRD clearly identifies a fictional task-list filtering feature and describes its reversible, local behavior, but it gives little detail…”
run 27d1810a-2757-438a-8d21-b8e89df97932“The artifact clearly distinguishes the proposed feature from runtime verification; however, independent readback or other supporting eviden…”
run f8800a91-d750-4ed0-9f92-1a1eda848038Prefer the unedited version? Open a live room, warts and all.